“We are here to depolarize America”: we had group therapy between Democrats and Republicans

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email

According to a recent survey, 80% of Americans are convinced that their country is deeply divided politically. In the run-up to the mid-term elections, franceinfo attended a workshop aimed at reconciling progressives and conservatives.

The spacious Hall of Unitarian Universalist Church in Arlington, Virginia ( USA ), fills up calmly, Saturday, October 27. On a large table, volunteers begin to have displays for each place, on which are carefully inscribed the names of the guests of the day. Seven names are written in red, the color of the Republicans, and seven others in blue, the color of the Democrats. In a few minutes, those Americans who are all opposed will move side by side, and talk together about politics. Not to debate, and inevitably hang on, but to try to find common ground.“Welcome, we are Jane and Reena,” start the two women responsible for leading the day. “Eight out of ten Americans think the United States is deeply divided, so we are here to depolarize America!”  they announce, under the discreet laughter of the audience. These “moderators”, therapists in real life, are about to launch a new workshop of the association Better Angels, founded in the wake of the election of Donald Trump. Their mission? Forcing the meeting – and the reconciliation – between two Americas: the one that voted, by default or conviction, for Donald Trump , and the one who still lives badly the debacle of Hillary Clinton.

If you want to convince the other side, you are mistaken. Here, what we are looking for between you, these are common points.
Reena
one of the two leaders

Sitting around the table, a “blue” between each “red”, the day starts with the presentations. Who are these men and women, and why did they choose to come to this workshop? Diana, an analyst in Arlington, is a Democrat, and would like to learn to talk to Republicans. Monte, a professor of history and social sciences at a high school in Alexandria, Virginia, is Republican and has felt the need to “get involved” in these exchanges. Phyllis and JC, two “blue” pensioners, therefore Democrats, see their country split in two, and worry. “I have relatives who are ‘red’, and it’s war with them,” laments JC, behind an imposing white beard.

These volunteers are among the more than 3,000 Americans who, on both sides of the United States, have already taken part in these atypical days. In just two years, Better Angels has organized nearly 250 workshops from Texas to Minnesota through California. The idea of ​​Better Angels was born after the presidential election on November 8, 2016. Two friends, David Blankenhorn and David Lapp, are called that day. One is in New York, and describes a “depressing” mood after Donald Trump’s victory. The other is in South Lebanon, Ohio, and observes a festive atmosphere after the defeat of Hillary Clinton. Witnesses of such a contrast, they wonder. “Why not bring together Democrats and Republicans?”

We rarely talk about politics with people with different opinions. Our goal is to ensure that these Americans see each other as human beings first and foremost, not as political enemies.
Donna Murphychief
organizer of Better Angels

Engaged in the project since May 2017, the progressive Donna Murphy concedes that, from now on, she “likes” the “reds”. “They have become friends ,” she says with a smile, ” I still disagree with them, but I see their humanity, before they were just adversaries.”

Deconstruct (and recognize) critics

In Arlington Church, it is time for the first conciliation exercise. The two clans move to separate rooms, followed by silent observers. Each group, isolated from the other, must write in black and white a list of stereotypes reproached to their political edge. And distinguish the true from the false in these prejudices. “We’re mean, stupid, angry and crazy, right?”  Bruce, a 74-year-old conservative pensioner, comfortably seated among other Republicans. His neighbors let out a laugh. “Without compassion,” says Bryan, a 33-year-old consultant. “Homophobic, misogynist,”adds Teri.

The group stops by the idea that the Conservatives are racist. “It’s not true,” react two participants. “But is not there a foundation of truth?”  causes the host Jane. “In immigration, it is true that some ‘red’ focus on Hispanics,”  admits Bryan, accepting this criticism of the left. “And white nationalists often identify as ‘red’,” assumes another young conservative.

In the other room, the “blues” look at several shots. In particular on the one, conveyed by the right, according to which the Democrats “are against the family values” . Several volunteers defend themselves. “Including non-Christian people, or being pro-choice [for the right to abortion] does not question our commitment to family values,”  says one of the participants. Reena, like her colleague, pushes them to their limits. “Recognizing a diversity of genres can be difficult, confusing for some,”  Tony agrees.

After the introspection, place to self-criticism. Together, “blue” and “red” must confide in what is good on their side and what is not right for them. Republican Bryan regrets the lack of reflection on the climate among supporters of the Grand Old Party. On the side of “blues”, Diana concedes that the Democrats carry only one message, “anti-trumpism”. “We should be more interested in the demands of his constituents,” says Allen. At each concession, the audience applauds.

Possible common ground

Thanks to the workshop, “I learned for example that for the ‘reds’, the concept of solidarity in their community, in their neighborhood, is also important, I work a lot, and I will be less afraid to do it with them, ”  says Diana. “Amen, my sister,” Teri, her conservative neighbor, reacts. The two women, opposed on the political chessboard, exchange a “high five” accomplice.

The time for debate has now come. For an hour, each side asks the questions they want on the other side. But  “attention, do not ask a ‘red’ how he could vote for Donald Trump or a ‘blue’ how he could support Hillary Clinton  warns, tone laughing, Reena, host. Ask questions curious. ” Deena responds to Republicans blaming the Democrats for a lack of tolerance of conservative views. “I totally agree with that,”  she asserts, citing freedom of expression.   

Over the exchange and against all odds, the American president becomes the main subject of agreement between “blue” and “red”. To the question  “Are you worried about the lack of competence and honesty of Donald Trump?”,  Two Republicans answer in chorus “yes, yes and yes!”. “Thank you, thank you” , blows the Democratic clan, reassured to see that there are conservatives far from being trumpists. On the migration policy of the Trump administration, the same convergence: the separation of migrant families “violates American values” , and the president’s rhetoric about the caravan of migrants “plays on the fear of people” ,

The day is coming to an end. The 14 participants, still surrounded by observers, meet in the hall of the church to take stock of the workshop. “Well, we found things in common,” says Monte. “Their answers were more reasonable than I expected!”  smiles the “blue” JC. Around the table, Deena and Allen promise to talk to more Republicans. The latter nevertheless has a doubt: “Are we really representative of the national debate?”  if he asks. “I’m not sure there are really any ‘reds’ here ,” says the “blue.” I think there are rather “nice reds.”

The organization Better Angels now wants to tackle this challenge. “The next step will be the rural areas,” reputedly more conservative and closer to Trump, said Donna Murphy. Can an early Trumpist ever get along with a deep democrat? A Better Angels, we’re convinced – it’s already happened.

Read the full article here

More to explore

Two Kinds of Half-Depolarization

Depolarization, as we at Better Angels see it, is not so much about reducing partisanship or increasing moderation, as it is about re-building social ties and relationships across partisan divides, and reducing individuals’ sense of disgust for people of opposing political opinions.

Bob Shrum

Diagnosing the Divide with Bob Shrum

Democratic strategist Bob Shrum stops by The Better Angels Podcast to talk polarization, campus politics and the challenges facing the Democratic field.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *